Your board wants cyber accountability.
Your adversaries are already inside.
The gap between board-level accountability and operational AI deployment is where organizations face their greatest exposure — and where most governance frameworks stop working.
The threat landscape has shifted. AI governance gaps are now a material business risk — not a future concern.
of organizations lack controls to detect unauthorized AI agents operating internally
KPMG · Q3 AI Pulse Survey, 2026
of boards cannot adequately challenge management on AI risk with credibility
EY Board Governance Report, 2026
average cost of an AI-related incident with material financial damage
IBM Cost of AI Incident Report, 2026
days average time to identify and contain an AI governance failure
Ponemon Institute, 2026
Built for the executives who own the accountability
AI governance without a human-layer strategy leaves the most consequential risks unaddressed. We work with the leaders who can't hand that problem to IT.
"My board wants AI ROI proof and I can't show it yet — and I can't explain the risk either."
Board Alignment"36% of organizations have already experienced AI incidents with material financial damage. I don't have a framework for quantifying that exposure before it hits the P&L."
Financial Risk Quantification"We have AI regulatory exposure we can't articulate to the audit committee."
Regulatory Risk"Our workforce isn't ready for agents — and nobody in this organization owns that problem."
Workforce Readiness"26% of organizations can't detect unauthorized AI agents operating internally. I own the infrastructure — but not the governance layer that should be catching this."
Agentic Oversight"We know AI is material. We don't know how to challenge management on it with credibility."
AI LiteracyThree ways to engage — matched to where you are
Every engagement starts with a clear outcome, not a scope of work. You choose your entry point based on urgency and readiness.
A structured 90-minute session that gives your leadership team a clear picture of your AI exposure, board communication gaps, and governance readiness — with language calibrated for the boardroom, not the server room.
A 3–4 week structured assessment that identifies where human-layer governance gaps exist across your AI deployments — including agentic systems — and produces a prioritized action plan aligned to ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF.
Ongoing strategic access for organizations navigating active AI governance challenges — regulatory pressure, board scrutiny, or agentic deployment at scale. Includes board prep support, incident response guidance, and human oversight architecture design.
"The biggest agentic AI risk is that human oversight hasn't evolved accordingly."
John McLain, EY · September 2026
This is exactly what Human-Centric AI Resilience addresses — the governance layer that evolves with the systems it governs.
PhD in Psychology
Behavioral risk, cognitive bias, and human-systems analysis applied to AI governance — a dimension technical and legal advisors don't bring.
15+ Years Cybersecurity Leadership at VP Level
GRC, security risk management, compliance, and architecture across regulated industries — not theory.
CAIO · ISO 42001 Lead Auditor · IAPP AIGP
The technical and standards fluency to operate across the full governance stack — strategy through implementation.
Currently VP of AI Governance
Active enterprise implementation experience — every engagement draws on what's happening in production environments today.
Start with a 90-minute briefing
No scope of work. No retainer required. A single structured conversation that gives your leadership team clarity on where you stand — and what to do next.
Engagements typically begin within 2 weeks of initial contact.
Schedule a Security Briefing
Tell us about your organization and we'll be in touch within one business day.